Skip to main content

Are we on a right track to become a multi-trillion Economy?

 Very often, we tend to see poverty as people’s unwillingness to work. When we see someone beg at a traffic light or in the market, people hard-selling balloons or toys, we tend to think that they are doing so because they choose the easy way out and not willing to work. While it could be right in some instances, it’s not correct to a large extent. There are still many remote villages in many states, where livelihood still depends upon forest collection, birds’ rearing. It’s not that they are unwilling to switch to other occupations but that not enough opportunities are available. We generally see everyone’s environment as the same as ours and become oblivious to the reality behind it.

When any public policy is designed, it is done to help businesses, which also helps create employment opportunities for many. And in many times, the interest of Businesses and native people might differ, but since the Country’s Growth is seen in terms of GDP and lobbying power is available with mainly businessmen, poor people’s interest is often neglected or not given enough thought. If in construction of a highway, some forest is amputated or some shops are dismantled or someone’s agricultural land is taken, not many thoughts are given about the livelihood of people who are affected by this. And, its reason is simple, neither Government has the manpower nor willingness to hear all stakeholders in a job in which it thinks the job will help Businesses. Employment creation opportunities are always considered as a secondary objective.

I come from a village where about one-fourth of the population runs shops, and that’s the only source of earning. Some years back there were rumors of construction of Highway through our village which could led to the demolition of about half the shops and those who got effected were getting remuneration equal to price in Govt book which was abysmal as compared to the market price. This highway construction might help some Businesses save some fuel costs or save some hours of travel, but that could not be compared with the loss of livelihood of many people. Similarly, there are places where people rely on forests for their daily essentials, and that’s the only source of survival. How many thoughts are given in seeing the dependence of resources that are getting destructed in the construction of Highway is the question to ponder upon?

But then the question arises, “what could be the correct way of development”? Highways, Big infrastructure projects, Dams seem as a symbol of the Country’s development. We may construct highways today, which in turn will create employment opportunities for many, and ultimately, some people will come out of poverty, and some will become millionaires. But it could leave many worse off, whose number could be multiple times to those who got better. And since the voice of depressed ones will not be strong enough to roar, they will be forgotten, and this will continue. Sometimes I thought that problem also lies in how we measure Growth. If instead of GDP, growth indicators would be the number of people above the poverty line, decisions could be different. However, the problem lies somewhere else as well. It could be in human nature itself; when one gets power/success in life, one loses basic humility. The quest of being superior to others makes them blind to the realities of life. Those in decision-making seats forget the responsibility/ onus which that seat has put on them. Ignorance, along with pride, makes things worse.

And the system in place has a larger role to play. In a poverty-ridden country, where jobs are abysmal, getting Government jobs were seen as a status symbol. When getting a job was not seen as an opportunity to serve/ work, but a feeling of superiority of intellect over many, the intention of doing that job sincerely enormously decreases. This behavior/process continues the societal hierarchy in jobs and decisions inefficient. Politics at the local level was always based on the power one hold over others, and these jobs continued to serve their purpose.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How much Government Debt is the correct Debt?

As per the Economic survey and other studies, if Debt's interest rate is less than the Country's growth rate (measured by GDP), Debt is sustainable. Currently, the interest rate on sovereign Bonds on average is about 5%. If we calculate future interest rates from the yield curve, it is still less than 6%. Assuming worst-case scenario, if the interest rate increased to about 8%, then required GDP growth in real terms needs to greater than 3% (assuming the average inflation rate to be 3%), which does not seem to be an issue of much concern. But the question that arises is how much Debt should Country take? The Country's current Debt to GDP ratio is 68%, which amounts to 1.9 trillion USD . Assuming an interest rate of about 5% on average, this amounts to an interest payment of 95 Billion USD. India's 2020 budget was 410 Billion USD (Rs 30 lakh Crores). Hence about 25% of the budget is spent on the interest payment. The study says that if Govt spends this loan which tran...
Post a Comment
Read more

What can you do as citizens to make democracy more vibrant?

Recall the time of Anna Andolan, Nirbhaya's case, Ramdev Andolan. Could those movements have gain that significance had media polarized the issue and kept different intentions and didn’t give sufficient coverage? We never felt pride in our media houses, but we were too not ashamed of these at that time. We never blamed it for being pro-government or pro-corporate. At that time as well, many politicians owned some stakes in media houses but they didn’t dare to interfere with their working, or at least it was not apparent enough. There was a strong coherent voice against the government, raising questions on everything that matters. Media houses didn’t have notions of nationality, right conduct. Professionals, subject matter experts' views were respected. They intended to bring new perspectives into the country, not to streamline all ideologies in one direction. We need to check how this polarization of media started and where are we heading? Can we draw parallels with some...
Post a Comment
Read more

Birth-Days: An introspection

Why do I want to write about it? Maybe I want to compare this experience in years to come. Perhaps I want to introspect about happening around day in a better way, or it might just be that I want to write about something. So the day started at midnight with a video call from the usual group of friends. One question which haunts me is that is it always so that every person has some group of friends with whom they are always in contact, who seems to do it for the sake of love, with no second thoughts attached. I do not know. Was I expecting a call from them? Yes. How would have I felt had they not called me? Sad possible. In childhood, I remember, it was not friends who used to wish me first but parents. So, when did this happen, that friends’ wishes became more important than parents’? Maybe college life changed the dynamics of relationships; I became closer to friends. I, too, remember that there were some groups of people in school also who used to make me feel special by wishin...
Post a Comment
Read more